Why the Rush??


First and foremost, I would like to draw your attention to the highlighted question in the picture – Why The Rush? Yes, this is a question that haunts me in the sphere of early education.

And the answer is one that I have heard too many times for comfort in my career as an early childhood practitioner; that being – “… because they have to learn to do that; they will have to do it next year at school!” And every time I hear this answer, I get angry, really angry for putting these tiny tots through rigorous lessons to prepare them for the ‘next year’! Isn’t ‘next year’ the ‘next year’ in the real sense of the term? Why should we try to teach children what is meant for ‘next year’ this year?

These codes of conduct and lessons are often followed at different situations at preschools; some of them being when children are seated during story time, or when they stand in a line to be lead somewhere for some activity, or even when they are communicating with the teacher during a teaching-learning session. And it is then that these preschoolers are told to be still, raise their hands to answer, and stand in an orderly manner in a queue. Isn’t it a known fact that these are against the normal or expected activities of four year old children; who prefer to move, and jump, and run, and be active in all ways? Isn’t it telling them to do something that is against their basic nature when we tell them to sit still for half an hour, or walk sedately down a corridor in a perfect line?

On discussing with a passionate EC professional, I realised that this expectation is a result of the belief that although these children are in year four, it is beneficial for them to do year 5 work so that they are prepared for next year. Yes, it is this concept of ‘school readiness’ that is behind this propensity to rush, to make these toddlers do things that are meant to be done next year.

In a web magazine article by Helier Cheung, Hong Kong, the author notes how toddlers are given training to prepare for their first big interview; that being the interview to get admission in the best primary schools in the country, which are perceived to be the gateway to all opportunities. So the one and a half year old child is made to learn how to introduce herself to a stranger and answer his questions, as well as follow his instructions to do things like building a house with blocks, identifying pieces of fruits, and place pictures of facial parts in the correct places on a drawing of a face!

In India, things are no different. Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu and Venkatesh Chandrasekaran of the Department of Pediatrics, Puducherry, India, talks about the Indian parents’ desire to make their children ‘super heroes’. Their goal is to make their children excel in academics and also in extracurricular activities. The result is the introduction of formal education at the preschool level, which is primarily meant for skill development rather than on gaining in factual knowledge.

I believe that a compromise should be made so that we may make our preschoolers ready for school, but not at the cost of pushing them beyond their natural capabilities, thus introducing the feeling of stress in them at that early stage in their life.

I have observed that most preschools rely on the process of sitting, reading and writing as the means of educating children; but aren’t there other means too? Howard Gardner has stated that there are various different types of learning styles; I think we need to incorporate those that involve the natural tendencies of children of that age; that is by ‘doing’ rather than by ‘sitting, reading and writing’. This will serve the dual purpose of allowing children to be themselves; and learn in the process too! Yes, activity based learning is the key to real learning, especially at that tender age.

I would like to advise educationists to embrace the ‘NOW’ and forego of the ‘next year’. School readiness is an important concept and a necessity, I agree; but I also believe that stressing on the ‘now’ will be enough to make the children ready for the ‘next year’. So let a child fidget with his shoe lace during a story telling session. Let a child jump when in a line (ensure safety, of course); let a 3 year old child speak out of turn in class. It is time we stop pushing the children to be what they should be in the future; let us slow down and enjoy their natural behaviour patterns. Let us be happy with what they are meant to know and learn at that age and not strive to cram their heads with more facts that they can handle. And I believe by doing so, we will help in the growth of children who are in tune with their own capabilities, and happy in their own skins.

The following quotes are in support of my viewpoint:

  • “The children are the curriculum.” – Lisa Murphy
  • “Kids don’t remember what you try to teach them. They remember what you are.” – Jim Henson
  • “Choose happy” – Sue Knowles
  • “Play is the highest form of research” – Albert Einstein


Babu, Thirunavukkarasu, Arun., and Chandrasekaran, Venkatesh (2011). Current preschool education: Are we expecting more? Retrieved from: http://medind.nic.in/ibv/t11/i1/ibvt11i1p76.pdf

Cheung, Helier (2015). Toddlers prepare for their first big interview. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32040752

Cohen, Richard (2015). Zen and the Art of Early Childhood Education. Retrieved from: https://richie4360.wordpress.com/2015/09/09/zen-and-the-art-of-early-childhood-education/

Halton, Nicole (2015). Embracing the Now! Inspired EC – Providing inspirational professional development opportunities for Early Childhood Educators. Retrieved from: https://www.inspiredec.com/blog

Image  taken from: http://www.facebook.com/artofearlychildhood  (Richard Cohen’s “Zen and the Art of Early Childhood Education”
is on Facebook.


3 thoughts on “Why the Rush??

  1. This is absolutely True ,I mean pressure on child. I think getting children read for next year is an Outdated concept. It is more important to make child become a independent thinking child so he can take on any situation he faces.


  2. I simply love your post and your blog. I agree with you that we should not “rush” the children. The quote that you have posted says it all: The children are the curriculum.

    However, an alarm goes off in my head and heart when I observe “baby sitting” only type of preschools, where the only highlights of the day is meal time, nap time, and recess.

    In my opinion, the teachers need to be ready! When children begin to ask questions about how things work, we may not know the answer to everything, but we should at least be willing to explore with or teach the child how to explore and find out the answers. You have helped me to envision a new design and name for preschools.


    1. I had to shake my head when I read your discussion about India and Hong Kong. Unfortunately, it’s everywhere. When I lived and taught in New Jersey, I had heard about NYC and the preschool application. This article by Judy Batalion was in the NY Times in 2014, The 13 page Preschool Application. I read it with humor and disbelief. I wonder how the private schools are handling the Universal PreK, initiated in NYC this year?

      Batalion, J. (2014, February 11), The 13-page Preschool application. Motherload: Living the family dynamic. New
      York Times. Retrieved: http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/the-13-page-preschool-application/?_r=0


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s